Posts Tagged ‘Apple’
Greenpeace, iPad and Global Warming
Greenpeace, in its effort to “ensure the earth’s ability to nurture life in all its diversity” is now pinning on its efforts for some very important issues. By gunning for Nestle’s palm oil source and naming their popular product as Killer (Kitkat), Greenpeace has raised its voice for literally anything it feels is just non-earth-friendly.
Greenpeace is now aiming to highlight Apple’s ipad mobile devices which according to them rely on cloud computing and may contribute to global warming. It has also taken on other IT giants like Google, Facebook, MSN to be contributing their share towards critical climate-change. As of now it seems that Greenpeace has drawn a dotted line between the Apple’s ipad and global warming.
Greenpeace acknowledges the fact that if both the data centers and the telecommunication networks that are the two key components of the cloud continue to grow at current alarming rates, then by 2020 the electricity consumption would be half the current in the United States or more than France, Germany, Canada and Brazil combined. So with the growing cloud-computing needs in preparation for the iPad and with Apple purchasing a data center in South Carolina which is much larger than its existing facilities, Greenpeace feels that it needs to ask some important questions.
“Apple is the master of promotion, and while we marvel at the sleek unpolluted design of the iPad, we need to think about where this is all leading and how like all good surfers we can make sure our environment stays clean and green.”
Greenpeace seems to be going for a double-dip by either picking the largest brands when they are getting an exposure in the market and thereby earning another green money or is it that as an original green company it is focusing on the world issues like global warming that raises environmental issues to public knowledge? From a reputation management point of view, we feel that Greenpeace need to come out clearly on social platform that it’s not after “Apple” or “iPad,” but want to debate something very important; Global Warming.
Apple’s iPad or iSad?
Apple’s iPad has caught up with yet another controversy. Previously, it was the host of features, which were missing making it lose out to be a better choice than a notebook, now even the name ‘iPad’ has become an issue. It seems as if Apple has a habit to be in the news for various reasons .
The controversy saga continues; with the name ‘iPad’ in trouble. A Japanese electronic company ‘Fujitsu’ has alleged Apple for stealing their name ‘iPad’. According to Fujitsu their handheld computing device launched in 2002 was named iPad. There are also other takers for iPad like Siemens, which claims to be using the name iPad for their engines and other equipments. But in case of Fujitsu the name iPad is used for a similar kind of product like Apple’s.
Apple’s products have always been in the buzz for varied reason, similarly iPhone too had its share of woe when it rhymed with Japan’s Aiphone which led to confusion. Luckily Apple escaped with an agreement for a slight alteration of the Japanese spelling.
Though Apple has time till the end of Feb 2010 to prove this claim against Fujitsu, but it has to be seen how they defend this latest assault on the reputation of their brand. We strongly feel that Apple needs to realize that PR and reputation management are two different things and needs to be dealt accordingly. Being in news for all the bad reasons, is not good business. Remember reputation management is like a goal keeping, you save many but people tend to remember the one you missed.
Apple’s cart upset, again!
Apple is always cocky about its products, but the general feeling is it often overlooks the feedback and takes a beating on its reputation. Till Steve Jobs appears on TV to explain that all’s well!
In the News now is Apple’s application approval process, which is giving it a bad name. Users have no idea what is in store once they send an application to Apple for approval. With customers having more options online to publish their woes about the application, Apple seems to be getting entangled in world of bad products.
Nothing damages a company’s reputation like bad press. People in groups get connected on forums and social sites to discuss the issue or otherwise let the company know what their product is all about and the issue gets swollen.
As online reputation managers, what would we suggest?
That Apple needs to get into the damage control mode and ensure its customer that the application works according to customers expectation. Secondly to improve the current process by publishing additional reviews. Finally chalk out clear ways that could positively escalate the issue on social forums, and put across Apple’s view.
Hope Apple realizes that it takes time to recover from a bad reputation. And it’s not good to keep the customers guessing.