Posts Tagged ‘Apple’

Ping is not my Thing

Whenever Apple announces anything, the Tech world stops to discuss it as they are changing the world. Don’t get me wrong, I love the look and feel of Apple products, own an iPad which I utterly adore but I don’t strictly think of Apple as innovative any more. I also don’t think of them as a victory of style over substance so I am not a critic really. What they do, they do absolutely brilliantly down to the last detail. In so many ways they do little small touches where it really matters. At the same time, I don’t trust them at all and rarely use iTunes to buy music, don’t use the Mac that sits on a desk near me and don’t own an iPhone. I know they are excellent software engineers.. but for me they stand for an old paradigm of producer and consumer. They build things where you are not allowed under the hood to fiddle. I dont like that as my whole reading of the Internet age is that we get to fiddle and own our devices. Ping made me wonder whether I had Apple wrong after all and they were about to start embracing social media after all. For me Apple is cool in the designer sense and not cool in the run amok, dance in the mud in Glastonbury sense. Sounds strange but I think of them as the cool people in the bar that you are scared to talk to, but actually turn out to be nerdy and dweebish and are boring in bed because they are so self conscious. So is Ping the mashed up social web or a nervous half-hearted stab in the dark by Apple. Well, since I cannot access the iTunes store or rather the Ping part of it, it is impossible to say There is the question why I am writing this article at all. Reputations are like trees. They take time to grow and shape and they are difficult to change as time passes. Many successful companies rarely transition to business environments and I sense that this is what is happening with Apple. Already within one day their relationship with the uber-social Facebook has died, and it got me thinking that one of the aspects of Apple products is that they never seem to really talk on social media much.  They are wonderful devices and you can use them to do wonderful creative things but they don’t seem to go further. You consume them. What is the experience of Ping? Well it is not social and because it does not connect to anything else it is hard to see how I am going to use it. The main problem is that I cannot connect to anybody without emailing them which I cannot be bothered to do. You know, what with facebook, twitter and apps like Grooveshark (which Apple resolutely will not allow onto the apstore) why do i need Ping? I mean really, who cares.

HTC Counters Apple with Lawsuit

I have been following this Apple and HTC saga with great anguish. Back in March 2010, Apple Inc fired a lawsuit against HTC claiming that they infringed on its numerous patents. Now, last Monday HTC fired another salvo against Apple, complaining to the International Trade Commission to stop Apple from selling the iPod, iPhone and iPad.

HTC on the contrary has also accused Apple of stealing its patents about cellphone directory, power-management technology and hardware and software. As both the companies mudsling each other I get an idea that both have infringed on each others intellectual property.

From the business aspect, Apple’s attack on HTC was in some way to pull Google Inc, since HTC’s smart phone is based on the latter’s Android software, which gives them an edge over Apple’s iPhone. HTC’s counter action on other hand was on the expected lines.

Jason Mackenzie, HTC’s vice-president for North America, in a statement.

We are taking this action against Apple to protect our intellectual property, our industry partners, and most importantly, our customers that use HTC phones,

Now how strong HTC’s patent portfolio is something to be debated later, it’s not the phone specification that interest me but the way Apple loose their secret every time. They spend million dollars to come up with a product saying it’s unique, and then spend some more millions to keep the secret. Sadly the trade secret is all over the place. It’s like you want to keep the fire, but don’t want to feed the flame.

Reputation Management For.com feels that Apple or any company should protect their intellectual property or least get used to such situation. In the age of Internet and social media this is how it will be and won’t be getting any better.  But, every time raking up controversy generates negative influence, least you pump another hundred thousands to convince your consumers. We know where law suits end up, and finally you are back to mind your business, but this time post-mud slugging you may have to satisfy by losing a major chunk of your market share and Reputation.

Greenpeace, iPad and Global Warming

Greenpeace, in its effort to “ensure the earth’s ability to nurture life in all its diversity” is now pinning on its efforts for some very important issues. By gunning for Nestle’s palm oil source and naming their popular product as Killer (Kitkat), Greenpeace has raised its voice for literally anything it feels is just non-earth-friendly.

Greenpeace is now aiming to highlight Apple’s ipad mobile devices which according to them rely on cloud computing and may contribute to global warming. It has also taken on other IT giants like Google, Facebook, MSN to be contributing their share towards critical climate-change. As of now it seems that Greenpeace has drawn a dotted line between the Apple’s ipad and global warming.

Greenpeace acknowledges the fact that if both the data centers and the telecommunication networks that are the two key components of the cloud continue to grow at current alarming rates, then by 2020 the electricity consumption would be half the current in the United States or more than France, Germany, Canada and Brazil combined. So with the growing cloud-computing needs in preparation for the iPad and with Apple purchasing a data center in South Carolina which is much larger than its existing facilities, Greenpeace feels that it needs to ask some important questions.

“Apple is the master of promotion, and while we marvel at the sleek unpolluted design of the iPad, we need to think about where this is all leading and how like all good surfers we can make sure our environment stays clean and green.”

Greenpeace seems to be going for a double-dip by either picking the largest brands when they are getting an exposure in the market and thereby earning another green money or is it that as an original green company it is focusing on the world issues like global warming that raises environmental issues to public knowledge? From a reputation management point of view, we feel that Greenpeace need to come out clearly on social platform that it’s not after “Apple” or “iPad,” but want to debate something very important; Global Warming.

Apple’s iPad or iSad?

Apple’s iPad has caught up with yet another controversy. Previously, it was the host of features, which were missing making it lose out to be a better choice than a notebook, now even the name ‘iPad’ has become an issue. It seems as if Apple has a habit to be in the news for various reasons .

The controversy saga continues; with the name ‘iPad’ in trouble. A Japanese electronic company ‘Fujitsu’ has alleged Apple for stealing their name ‘iPad’. According to Fujitsu their handheld computing device launched in 2002 was named iPad. There are also other takers for iPad like  Siemens, which claims to be using the name iPad for their engines and other equipments. But in case of Fujitsu the name iPad is used for a similar kind of product like Apple’s.

Apple’s products have always been in the buzz for varied reason, similarly iPhone too had its share of woe  when it rhymed with Japan’s Aiphone which led to confusion.  Luckily Apple escaped with an agreement for a slight alteration of the Japanese spelling.

Though Apple has time till the end of Feb 2010 to prove this claim against Fujitsu, but it has to be seen how they defend this latest assault on the reputation of their brand. We strongly feel that Apple needs to realize that PR and reputation management are two different things and needs to be dealt accordingly. Being in news for all the bad reasons, is not good business. Remember reputation management is like a goal keeping, you save many but people tend to remember the one you missed.

Apple’s cart upset, again!

Apple is always cocky about its products, but the general feeling is it often overlooks the feedback and takes a beating on its reputation. Till Steve Jobs appears on TV to explain that all’s well!

In the News now is Apple’s application approval process, which is giving it a bad name. Users have no idea what is in store once they send an application to Apple for approval. With customers having more options online to publish their woes about the application, Apple seems to be getting entangled in world of bad products.

Nothing damages a company’s reputation like bad press. People in groups get connected on forums and social sites to discuss the issue or otherwise let the company know what their product is all about and the issue gets swollen.

As online reputation managers, what would we suggest?
That Apple needs to get into the damage control mode and ensure its customer that the application works according to customers expectation. Secondly to improve the current process by publishing additional reviews. Finally chalk out clear ways that could positively escalate the issue on social forums, and put across Apple’s view.

Hope Apple realizes that it takes time to recover from a bad reputation. And it’s not good to keep the customers guessing.