Archive for September 2010
Google Suggest – Instant Answers to Questions You Never Asked
The new service by Google has lit quite the fire under the SEO market as users are using search tool Google Instant under a new ‘Stop, Drop and Scroll’ policy. Highly innovative in design, the ability to constantly refresh the suggested search terms (and then a page of search results for said suggested terms) is said to “revolutionize the industry”.
Yes, well, this is all well and good for Joe Bloggs who wants to find that restaurant he went to last year but can’t quite remember the name of because he was a little drunk and was more concerned with the low cut top his date was wearing, but people in the SEO industry have had to go back to the ol’ drawing board.
It used to be enough to optimize pages to respond to keyword searches. A bit of market research could show you what people were searching for, and what words they were using. You could optimize pages so that they scored highly in keyword density and meta tags. And of course, it helped if your links themselves were optimised. Getting to the top of Google then relied upon the strength of your page and how many strong links were directing to your site. Simpler times!
With Google Instant now predicting search queries as the user types, it’s causing a dramatic shift in what’s being searched for. There have been arguments over how many people actually look at their screens as they type anyway, and whether they would even see the suggestions coming up on their screen until they’re finished typing? But then people are very easily influenced by the power of suggestion, and will likely end up “searching” for for things that Google suggests, rather than following up on their original query.
So the problem SEO faces is a way of overcoming the fact that users aren’t necessarily going to be “searching” for the things you expect them to. The French don’t seem to like Google too much, and have now found Google liable for a search term that came up next to somebody’s name that was considered defamatory in nature. Also, because the person was related to an ongoing (seperate) court case, the French judicial system also claimed Google were potentially guilty of influencing the outcome of that court case too. Google’s response was “the ‘suggestions’ produced by Google Suggest are an aggregate of user-entered search terms”. Well, that’s useful information at any rate.
In terms of how SEO companies can react to this – it seems fairly straightforward. There’s the obvious re-emphasis on getting search results into the top 3 or 4 (due to the ‘drop down’ of suggested searches occupying a greater portion of the displayable page than the standard text box). That’s just down to trying harder to achieve what SEO engineers were already trying to achieve anyway. Now though, because your standard two-keyword searches are likely going to be based on suggested third terms too, there is more to optimize for. Optimizing for search strings like “one two” is straightforward enough, but if you’re trying to optimize for “one two” and Google suggests “one two three”, “one two buckle my shoe” and “one two three four” – you might have a problem. The search results that come up wont be for the original search string “one two” but for the top suggested search term “one two three”, and then give the user the options for the other suggested terms, the user is statistically more likely to click one of the suggested terms than stick by their original search.
Contrary to suggestion that Google Instant has killed SEO and Reputation Management, the reality is far from it. What it has done is made SEO harder and Online Reputation Management more important. As an SEO company, you’re going to have to focus on both ensuring you optimize pages that directly relate to directly relevant search strings, but also find a way of optimizing for suggested search terms too.
With all the work that’s gone into optimizing webpages up to this point, and Google Suggest diluting the concentration of hits a properly optimized website was receiving previously, SEO companies will now have a busier time than ever to achieve the results they were previously enjoying. By that same token, SEO companies are also set to soar in their demand.
Out of great chaos comes great order, and with it – great profit.
Fighting ACS:Law
For those who aren’t yet aware, ACS:Law is the law firm who’re currently specialising in intellectual property law operating in the United Kingdom, and who’ve frequently been in the press creating a fuss over internet piracy.
ACS:Law, already a proverbial thorn in the proverbial sides of innocent internet users nationwide, reported that it has recently suffered a malicious attack and had over 5000 records of personal information leaked to the internet. These records included the names of thousands of people who’ve supposedly been filesharing pornographic videos online. While the information collected is by no means conclusive, it has left a lot of people worried about their reputation and being linked to some very questionable material. On Tuesday, British broadcasting giants Sky (whose customers were among those leaked) announced that until law firm ACS:Law could ensure “adequate measures to protect the security of personal information” it was ceasing any and all cooperation with the company.
And now, adding to what is becoming a legal pantomime, BT has just announced that it sent ACS:Law a list of it’s own customers in an entirely unencrypted format. D’oh!
For a company that prides itself in its reputation, this latest mistake is likely to cost the company a lot of consumer confidence as news spreads of BT’s misdemeanor. It’s been observed that sending the information to the lawfirm in an unencrypted file puts BT in serious breach of the Data Protection Act by failing to keep customers information secure.
On Wednesday Information Commissioner Christopher Graham said that he could levy fines of up to £500,000 for such breaches of data integrity. But can you really place a cost on trust? If you could, how much would it be worth to a company who brought in £248 million in profit for 2009? BT have never seemed like the kind of company that would show disregard for their customers, and maybe if they manage their reputation properly and deal with the current dilemma amicably, it wont cause them too big a hiccup.
One thing is for sure though, if there’d been any information on BT employees on that list it’d have certainly not have been released so casually!
Fund Management Costs and Industry Reputation
The last few years have put paid to the reputations of banks as
- trustworthy
- honest
- good businesses and good business people
The more shadowy world of funds management and trusts has been largely ignored with the notable exception of hedge funds. Such fund managers who are in the public eye often give the industry as a whole a very good name – notably the Sage of Omaha, Warren Buffett. A recent post by semi-legendary London analyst Terri Smith presents a case for a major onslaught on the fund management industry as a whole and at the nub of it is the way fees are charged on investments. (You can read the post here)
What is notable is that there is an implication that his new fund will use a very different fee structure from which we can infer that there is likely to be a wider and louder marketing battle. Trust fund managers get used to the spotlight and the reputation damage that will likely ensue.
Many fund managers have limited brand presence: branding is not seen as significant within the Royal Mile and they have grown used to not being in the public eye but a new generation of net savvy investors are likely to be more vocal about your shortcomings in the future. One of the problems with poor brand equity is that small attacks have a disproportionate impact upon revenues. Lets face it when there are a lot of fund managers you can as easily use another if you have heard bad things about your first choice.
Companies tend to focus on their company reputation and more rarely on the overall reputation of their industry, although it is the wider reputation that tends to impact them over the long term. Most of us dont understand the intricacies of fund management and high finance. However, we can all understand high fees and percentages. There may now be a meaningful tool to whip the industry with.
RIM’s Playbook: Developer Reputation is key
Research in Motion has announced their new tablet called “Playbook” which they plan to launch in first quarter 2011. A few years ago this would have been a major headline but in many tech and developer forums it hardly garnered a comment. RIM potentially faces the slow death of Nokia if they cannot get developers on board. What do they need to do? Read the rest of this entry »
Google’s Drop Down Starting To Cause Real Concern
Over the last few weeks the Google suggestion drop down has been causing more issues for businesses and individuals alike. Its fine if the suggestions are helpful or positive however if you get slammed with scam, complaints etc as a Google suggestion then you are in trouble. See the test these guys did on Google Drop Down. An example of helpmegoto.com scam where they managed to trigger the suggestions even without a website.
Google Instant has made the google suggestions much more of a feature…. Lets see what happens over the next few months with law suits.
The X-Factor Bad Press Mafia
If there’s one show that’s guaranteed to generate headlines, it’s Simon Cowell’s The X-Factor, screening on ITV in the UK. And while we’re all used to the stories of grief that the shows contestants claim as their motivation, this year has seen a couple of disturbing stories that are attracting all the wrong kinds of attention (forgetting momentarily that all publicity is good publicity).
It started a couple of weeks ago when Gamu Nhengu’s performance was adorned by audio-enhancement techniques. This created quite the ruckus amongst viewers who were upset that they were not getting an unbiased exposure to the contestants. But, as well as the folks at home not being all too pleased, Gamu’s troubles didn’t end there. A long with hundreds of thousands of disgruntled fans of the show, Ms Nhengu’s performance was also being watched the UK Border Agency.
It turns out that Gamu’s mother Nokutula was in the UK on a working visa which had actually expired without the possibility of extension. Yes, that would make Gamu, her mother and her two younger brothers illegally residing in the UK.
I’m sorry, but if you’re not entitled to live in Britain, and you’re staying in the country illegally… why in God’s name would you make an appearance on national television? If only Simon’s troubles ended there…
Other former X-Factor hopeful Chloe Mafia has already had to put up with articles popping up all over the news and media about her ‘professional life’ (the oldest, thereof), and now self-proclaimed misfit has openly admitted to taking drugs (cocaine). She also failed to make it past the ‘boot camp’ stage of the show, after arriving unprepared for her audition. Again.
No loss, she was rubbish anyway.
But, all the while contestants like Gamu Nhengu and Chloe Mafia are making headlines for all the wrong reasons though, the X-Factor is going from strength to strength. It seems nothing can touch this music behemoth’s reputation, but the same can’t be said for the contestants. These girls (assuming both are still in the country this time next week) are going to suffer from their auditions more than they stand to gain.
Everywhere they turn they’re going to be facing bad press. It’s not just the papers, which tend to go away and be forgotten about, but more and more frequently employers are ‘Googling’ potential employees and so every negative story about a person or company is available at the touch of a button. And now, with new Google Instant, users don’t even have to be searching for a negative story for one to come up via Google Suggest. Online Reputations are at an all-time vulnerable, and unfortunately for these X-Factor entrants – there’s very little they can do about theirs.
Paris Court Case Reveals Google Suggest Algorithm
A Paris court has fined Google to pay damages to a convicted sex offender as Google suggested ‘rapist’ when the plaintiff’s name was searched. The case against the plaintiff had not been decided when “Google Suggest” started suggesting the word ‘rapist’ alongside his name.
This is a crucial moment in a criminal case as the court needs to be impartial in how they go about conducting a case and this can be termed to media coverage and result in the conviction being quashed if the court decides that this has resulted in court members being influenced.
However, this could be even bigger when it comes to a company or a celebrity going through a criminal case. It could be huge for Public Relations and Reputation Management even if it is, for now, a ruling confined to France alone where anti-Google judgement are par for the course.
This is Google’s second conviction in France over suggested queries and the company continues to claim that -
“Google Suggest is an aggregate of the most popular searches based on past requests from users. Google does not suggest these terms.”
This is disingenuous to say the least, especially since they actually call it Google Suggest – suggest itself being a verb and not a noun. The French are clearly not buying Google’s defence and the court has ordered Google to pay 5,000 euros (6,700 dollars) towards the plaintiff’s costs. Being the second conviction in France this year for Google suggest, the company will have to consider how they are going to frame the fucntion within the law in France.
For Google watchers, these cases provide a brief and limited insight into how Google operates its search algorithm. A trade secret about which Google quite naturally likes to say very little if possible. It also shows how challenging it is going to be for Google as they balance being both a machine determined search engine and also being viewed as a media publisher. In effect, the court is saying that Google decides what they show and that the Suggest feature may be an aggregate but it is also a published piece of media.
Oh Lindsay!
It was going to happen but where will it lead now.
A recent Pop Eater poll suggest that “fans” are tired of Lohan shenanigans and want to see her jailed. Some 84% expressed their frustration at her behavior and suggesting that the Lohan brand is suffering from her drug addiction problems. Well, there dreams have come true with Judge Fox sending her straight to jail with no bail. The star had run something of a campaign online during the week tweeting about visiting AA (Alcoholics Anonymous) and accepting that she has a disease, all aimed at mitigating her plea and perhaps keeping her out of jail.
Where now for Lohan whose celebrity star is kept bright by all this constant paparazzi news but whose film bankability may well suffer. Is she insurable, we wonder.
Nokia Fades Away (to Windows)
For those of you old enough to remember, Nokia used to have a hell of a reputation for technical skill and prowess. The annoying Nokia ring tone was the distinctive sound of the mobile revolution. Those days are gone and in the tech mobile world the talk now is of iOS and Android. It seems that nobody talks about Nokia and that is why they are fading away. The life blood of a technical platform is traction and traction is one thing that Nokia no longer has.
News that Nokia will start building a phone for Windows 7 mobile is surely death knell evidence for this. In the world of mobile it might be likened to two drunks propping themselves up. The recent laughable Windows 7 tablet previews on Youtube suggest strongly that the desktop operating system is going to find it hard to migrate to the touch screen mobile world of the future.
What went wrong? In simple terms, Nokia got arrogant and walked away from the absolute engagement with developers and the ecology of their platform (something Twitter might be starting to do already) and as a result that ecology dried up. Of course a lot of people still use Nokia but that is only because they are cheap not because they have much to offer. The brand that was once king, must now beg at Microsoft’s door. Building reputation ecologies takes a lot of time and patience and requires a certain type of culture in the organisation. As organisation grow larger they find it harder to share. In traditional markets your ecology are your retailers or your distributors – and you stand at the top. In the technology markets your ecology are your partners and they are strategic.
It might have been different if Nokia had recognised the iPhone from the get go, but instead they derided it. It was pointed a way forward which they chose to ignore. How their stock holders must regret that in hindsight!
Naughty or not naughty David Beckham
Men divide into two camps with David Beckham: those who love him and those who think he is a monotoned voice bore. The same dichotomy applies to wife Victoria: you either think she is a talented and sexy twig or you abominate her humourless demeanour and all round frigidity. If you are in the latter camp you tend to understand why David Beckham might have slept with the most expensive hooker in the USA. More enticing is her allegation she recruited another woman to help take the load (so to speak).
Does David Beckham help the reputation of Brand Beckham by suing a magazine for publishing the story? Probably as this is aimed at restoring the “fairytale” romance of the Beckhams which underpins so much of their brand ambassadorship. Was it the only way? No. If you can prove the magazine wrong, then demand that they print the true facts, ask for £1000 for charity and laugh it all of. Beckham, unlike Victoria, has always had a certain grace. She should work to keep it. As far as many men are concerned it is a case of “Good on you mate!”