Archive for June 2010
How Reputation Management For.com works?
We have written a lot on online reputation management, but this time the topic is going to be Reputation Management For.com and the business we are doing at Reputation Management For.com. This because reputation management is now an organised industry, with big business being done.
So what’s special about Reputation Management For.com?
- We have been ranked No.2 by topseos.com: topseos.com, an independent authority on search vendors, has ranked us No.2 among the Best Top 10 Reputation Management Firms in the US for the month of June 2010.
- We don’t cut corners: We don’t like taking short-cuts or going the easy way. We work hard to win.
- We move with the times: We move with the times and take in all changes, technology-wise and otherwise too.
- We work 24×7: Spread across continents and with our team-members working from different countries, we manage to keep it all going 24×7, 365 days a year.
How does it work?
Online Reputation Management is not that simple, but with our expertise and experience, we get to make it all simple. So here’s a list of what all we do, for our clients:
- Writing blogs, posting articles etc for you, to make sure you get a real big online presence.
- Writing professional online press releases for you, keeping track of all updates concerning you and your company.
- Branding. Branding is our forte. We take you for a brand and set out to promote you using all resources available.
- Providing quality content, coming from genuine writers who have a passion for writing and who know how SEO works.
- Providing full assistance from a team of writers, SEO professionals, designers, programmers et al, spread over different parts of the world.
- Making sure your presence is felt in a big way on the social networking zone, focussing on social networking sites and doing social bookmarking too.
- Giving top priority to promptness and professionalism.
- Using advance technology, tools and gadgets that help track and mend online reputation management.
- Interacting frequently and freely with clients, making sure we deliver what they expect from us and also to impart to them the feedback that we get.
- Studying things in detail and bettering ourselves so that your trust in Reputation Management For.com remains intact…always.
What makes us different…
Well, all this is what every reputation management company does. So, what’s it that makes us different? Let’s take a look
- We maintain and mend the online reputation of a client who’s in real big reputation crisis. We have done that many a time and know ways to handle it. We salvage your reputation in the hours of the most severe of crises.
- We have been the first to recognise that the age of conventional PR is over and it’s now the age of Reputation Management. We do understand that in modern times, Reputation Management encompasses Public Relations and hence we are masters in Reputation Management as well as PR.
- We do day-to-day monitoring of our clients’ online reputation, maintain graphs, charts et al to support this monitoring.
- When it comes to using new ideas, new tools etc and making the most of research and analyses, Reputation Management For.com scores high marks.
What a salesman can tell you about your company
If you have ever done cold calling you will know what a tough and sometimes numbing activity it is. As every sales professional will tell you, it’s about doing the numbers. In other words, if you make enough calls you will makes your sales. After a while you prize one thing above all others in the people you call: honesty. If the person you call is honest with you, then you can be honest with them and it’ll just take a couple of minutes to assess whether there is a deal to be done. This is important as wasting time means not making the number of calls you need.
What is the normal situation? Dishonesty. They don’t tell you they are not interested, they don’t tell you what they need and they don’t explain the decision process. So, you witter on while they read emails until they ask you to send them some more information on email as though it is quicker for them to read the information rather than hear it from you.
What does all that tell us about the company they work for? Well, it suggests that the company is comfortable with dishonesty and to a certain extent, with a lack of professionalism. But does the company know this or care? Almost certainly not. I have a reason to think like this: I have noticed that the really great companies treat everybody the same whether they are customers or sales callers. They do not distinguish between different people or situations.
On the other hand, companies that treat sales callers badly and dishonestly often have a bit of a reputation for doing the same to their customers.
Great service is great service to whomsoever. So remember that the next time you forget that the guy making that sales call is potentially a customer and definately a human, you are doing yourself and your company no favours.
From a popular PM to the shortest-serving leader in Australia – Where did Kevin Rudd go wrong in managing his reputation?
It was only a year ago that Kevin Rudd was compared to Australia’s most popular leader Bob Hawke, but today he is coming to terms with the disreputable fact of being tagged “the most unsuccessful Prime Minister in Australian history”, the shortest serving one as well. And his once - popular campaign slogan “Kevin 07″ is today subverted to “Kevin 07, Gone By 11.” So where had he gone wrong?
Right from angering MPs, an unravelling personal image, getting no support in opinion polls and a series of other events (which were definitely not favourable for him) that finally culminated in Kevin Rudd being dumped by the Labour party and forced to hand over his office to Julia Gillard (Australia’s first woman Prime Minister), the reputation of Kevin Rudd has been badly damaged for quite some time now. And the speed of his demise showed the extent to how bad it was!
People who felt fooled at the last election were desperately looking for a hero in Kevin Rudd. How far did he meet their expectations? Mistakes were many, right from ratifying Kyoto to apologising to the stolen generation and the people who elected him to power felt he forgot why they got him to power.
One can get a fair idea of how Kevin Rudd’s reputation got drowned in the sea of the very same people who elected him to power from their views . Most of the people in the streets are of the opinion that Rudd failed in implementing most of the economic policies he himself introduced. The muffed home insulation farce, the school halls building program and the $900 stimulus handout are just a few examples. Finally to top it off , Rudd attacked the mining industry, which is the backbone of the Australian economy. Well now, the reputation of a PM obviously depends a lot on how far you are able to carry out the new economic policies introduced and failing to meet it will have consequences similar to the one Kevin Rudd had to go through.
There are people who say that Rudd has not kept a single election promise since being put in the PMs office. Earlier this week the media were saying that he only won the election because of his wife’s media campaign to get him into power. And, to say you have not kept promises is pretty bad from the reputation management point of view for a PM.
Past experiences whether it was in the case of Gordon Brown or Kevin Rudd speaks out the fact that PMs and politicians will have to keep in mind that people are empowered to throw anyone out of political office and hence they will have to above all maintain their reputation without any blemish at all.
As regards Kevin Rudd the only good news for him is that he does have a few people with him, who do believe that a PM being human can make mistakes or that Australia is not ready for a PM like Kevin Rudd.
But now with Kevin Rudd declaring (almost pledging) he will contest his seat of Griffith in Queensland at the next election, and http://www.google.com.au/ giving suggestions like “Kevin Rudd sorry” and “Kevin Rudd apology” for people typing his name at the same time, Kevin Rudd will have a hard job clawing back support and it necessarily does call for some serious reputation management too!
Some Companies Pay Attention… Land Rover & Quality

Do Land Rover fit together right?
Following the post of the weekend on Land Rover and the JD Powers IQS Survey, Jaguar Land Rover North America (the company name) responded with a more detailed rebuttal which I have quoted below in part (which I hope is okay with them). Two things interest me: they responded that fast which shows that they are paying attention to commentary and they responded in person. In other Jaguar Land Rover are reaching out to people who might be influencers.
I wanted to acknowledge reading your blog post on the J.D. Power quality ranking. Given our ranking, I guess we deserve random shots from afar, so no argument from me. I do want to share with you our position on the matter and give you some background on the survey itself.
The IQS survey measures customers’ reactions to how their vehicles’ function, such as in our case, the ease of closing and opening of a rear trunk, hatch and glove box, as well as items that require fixes, such as software updates for the Hands Free Communication System. Issues raised by owners do not specifically indicate malfunctions or build quality issues, but do represent a concern or dislike. There was no indication from J.D. Power that there were actual mechanical or driving problems, such as transmission failures. Frankly, the issues that arose were more annoying, than impactful on their reliability. Nothing to be proud of, but certainly the light-hearted imagery you portray of customers constantly driving to garages is misleading.On a positive note from this year’s survey, the Range Rover model was actually honored as a top rated quality vehicle in its segment. And in 2009, Jaguar placed tops in the industry for J.D. Power three year reliability (VDS). Also, our brands generally score well on J.D. Power’s APEAL survey, as well as overall sales and customer satisfaction surveys. Which basically means that while our vehicles might have some issues that pop up on this survey, those are strongly overshadowed by their overall great performance and design, as well as the desirability of the ownership experience. Nonetheless, we strive to do better.
In terms of the actual issues reported in this IQS survey, be assured actions are being taken. We have measures in place through the dealers to address most of the “fix” issues highlighted in the survey. In relation to the design issues, our team is committed to analyzing the comments and flowing these into future product considerations. Some criticized design items are already scheduled for improvement.
Delivering wonderful automobiles and ownership experiences is our top commitment. We can do better, but we also know that our customers generally love their automobiles and the service they recieve.
Please feel free to let me know if you have any questions about our company. …
There is some sense of humour in the opening which is great as so many companies respond to criticism with a blank denial or a no comment. (Given our ranking, I guess we deserve random shots from afar, so no argument from me.) They also have a positive take on the survey and a rebuttal in terms of quality as in top rated quality vehicle in its segment.
What can we understand from the two sides? The IQS reveals that Land Rover owners are affected by lots of little niggles with their vehicle which LandRover assures are being addressed with a proviso that underlying design faults or mechanical faults are few are far between. Do Land Rover buyers expect too much from their vehicles? Interesting that Porsche was at the top of the survey when they have never been considered especially reliable, but then owners expect the car to be a bit of handful. Is there an issue with build quality or is this dealer delivery for Land Rover?
Is it coincidence that Jaguar and Land Rover are at the bottom (with Mini and Mitsubishi)? Remember that this is a consumer survey so Land Rover Reputation Managers will be aware that this is their customers’ doing the talking which suggests that maybe they need to reach out to them more and shape their perceptions more. If the faults are small and nebulous, how can Land Rover ensure that their owners are unconcerned by them. Furthermore the issue is critical for Land Rover: the design is excellent, cachet undoubted, brand positioning spot on, but continued issues with quality will undermine all that excellent work. Land Rover has been plagued by issues of mechanical failure and poor dealer and service (see landroverhell.com for an especially angry example from continental Europe, my business partner experienced some of this as well in Scotland.)
End of Term Report for Land Rover: your communications team is on the spot, but service and customer perception needs work.
Land Rover’s Quality – Not an Issue!
J.D.Power’s 2010 US Initial Quality Study does make not bedtime reading for Land Rover Executives as their cars perform worst of all surveyed cars. (see graphic) Not just worse a little worse but substantially worse than their next rival Mitsubishi. Is this a problem for Land Rover? Not necessarily as there are two types of Land Rover owner: those who buy for prestige and those who buy for performance. Those who buy for prestige and who opt for Range Rovers do not seem to care about the quality and love the Columbian Cartel chic. There is another type of owner who buys the Discovery because it is practical for shopping and the kids (these are the people who think the streets are a mini Beirut where driving a tank is your only hope of survival) and for them, the constant gearbox failures and wonky electronics will turn them off the brand for life. Bad news for new owner Tata.

JD Power 2010 IQS Survey
A quick glance tells you something else: British car manufacturers still don’t get quality with Jaguar and Mini in the bottom five. That makes three out of five for British cars: enviable, NOT. The interesting thing to note is that these are prestige cars without an awesome reputation for design and style (except maybe for the Jaguar). They are bought for looks and possibly not for reliability. However, we have been here before with English cars… poor mechanics impacting long term sales. The Japanese built their market on reliability and service and the British lost their for the same reason.
What does the survey tell us: that owners of Land Rovers are more pissed off than other owners after 90 days! Closely followed by Mini. One reason may be that there is a perception in the market of quality which is not experienced. Bad news: early problems are predictors of long term problems with a car. Next time a Range Rover Vogue with darkened windows swooshes past you, remember, he is probably just driving to the garage!
Watching 11 Millionaires NOT earn their keep
There was a collective groan of despair as England got up from watching their team play Algeria last night. Fans in England watching from pubs mostly straggled home: what was there to talk about so awful and boring had the match been. For the fans who had spent thousands travelling to South Africa there wee boos for the England players.
Wayne Rooney was typically unapologetic after the match complaining about the fans booing him. English football was reborn after 1990 by the display of the team at World Cup Italia where to a soundtrack of Puccini we rediscovered a passion for the game. Since then Football has become very big business, but at the heart of it are the footballers and their attitudes. It may be that the non-appearance of England passion at this World Cup will change fans attitudes to the “beautiful” game. Footballers are millionaires and we expect them to play brilliantly every time! This group of England players have been non-performers in the England shirt for some years. Lets hope something happens in the next match or this will be another competition where England Fans 1, Players 0!
One of our Footballs Has Gone Missing – Adidas and the case of the missing footballs
The World Cup should be the highlight of the year for Adidas as they reflect on beating off Umbro and Nike to the main sponsorship of the tournament. How sour it must feel to be the butt of criticism for the performance of their soccer ball: the Jabulani Ball. It is being accused of being light when it is in fact heavy, they claim it has perfect soccer characteristics… but everyone hates it .

Jabulani Ball Construction
The drought of good goals in the first week of the tournament (apart from Argentina) is being blamed on the ball as well. You spend millions developing a new ball with amazing new technology, and this is all the thanks you get for it!
The English camp have been muttering with monoglot Capello hating it and accusing Adidas of not providing balls for practice. Now it is the English FA with very red faces after Adidas have provided evidence that the balls were delivered to them earlier in the year: the FA admit they have no idea what happened to them. Judging by the English performances so far, they need those balls for practice after their shambolic performance against Algeria which saw fans booing the millionaire English players off the pitch at the end of their 0-0 draw.
There is something wonderfully English about the FA. Amateur hour which is why the Premiership was formed to allow top clubs control of their own destiny. If there are not scandals of senior officials bonking their secretaries, they are presiding over the fiasco of Wembley. Now, the glittering history of mistakes and incompetence can be joined by the loss of the footballs and the possible loss of the World Cup in consequence. What a balls up!
