Archive for April 2010
Gordon Brown’s Reputation Management skills the need of the hour
With elections in the UK only a few weeks away, Reputation management and reputation campaigns have been the hottest buzz words doing the rounds. The speculation of a hung parliament this year might set off innovative reputation management tactics from both the ruling front and the opposition camps.
The election, which is the first to be faced by the Labour leader Gordon Brown as Prime Minister will be a hotly contested affair with many popular names including the opposition party leaders, David Cameron of the Conservatives and Nick Clegg of the Liberal Democrats in the fray. Reputation management will play a key role in this election for Gordon Brown, as No.10 Downing Street has been abuzz with speculations of the alleged bullying tactics of the British PM for quite some time now.
It would mean that the PM and his party workers start working on their online reputation to mend the damage caused by negative comments and bad reviews, which have been influencing the search results. No politician can afford to see his name tagged to something unsavoury during the crucial phase of general elections. Politicians should rope in campaign managers as well to clean up the mess and to project their ratings in the online media.
Unlike PR , Reputation managemett takes its own time to show the results. The party should embrace Gordon Brown’s reputation as a man of principle who is undeterred by confrontation and willing to bring change, same for David Cameron. Voters are going to bank heavily on what they read online. Gordon Brown and his team has to work out a sure shot reputation management plan that would spell out their policies and preferences apart from making their stand clear in the murkier issues clouding their repute!
Greenpeace, iPad and Global Warming
Greenpeace, in its effort to “ensure the earth’s ability to nurture life in all its diversity” is now pinning on its efforts for some very important issues. By gunning for Nestle’s palm oil source and naming their popular product as Killer (Kitkat), Greenpeace has raised its voice for literally anything it feels is just non-earth-friendly.
Greenpeace is now aiming to highlight Apple’s ipad mobile devices which according to them rely on cloud computing and may contribute to global warming. It has also taken on other IT giants like Google, Facebook, MSN to be contributing their share towards critical climate-change. As of now it seems that Greenpeace has drawn a dotted line between the Apple’s ipad and global warming.
Greenpeace acknowledges the fact that if both the data centers and the telecommunication networks that are the two key components of the cloud continue to grow at current alarming rates, then by 2020 the electricity consumption would be half the current in the United States or more than France, Germany, Canada and Brazil combined. So with the growing cloud-computing needs in preparation for the iPad and with Apple purchasing a data center in South Carolina which is much larger than its existing facilities, Greenpeace feels that it needs to ask some important questions.
“Apple is the master of promotion, and while we marvel at the sleek unpolluted design of the iPad, we need to think about where this is all leading and how like all good surfers we can make sure our environment stays clean and green.”
Greenpeace seems to be going for a double-dip by either picking the largest brands when they are getting an exposure in the market and thereby earning another green money or is it that as an original green company it is focusing on the world issues like global warming that raises environmental issues to public knowledge? From a reputation management point of view, we feel that Greenpeace need to come out clearly on social platform that it’s not after “Apple” or “iPad,” but want to debate something very important; Global Warming.
Nestle lands in palm oil slick after the milk powder scandal!
Nestle, the world’s largest food processor, was embroiled in a messy palm oil slick when it tried to remove a Greenpeace ad featuring an office worker eating orangutan fingers from YouTube. In the event of this ad campaign that brought to light the plunder of the rain forests and environmentally-damaging practices of Nestle, the multinational company has accepted the fact that they have been using palm oil from the destroyed rainforest, home of the last surviving orangutans.
Forests and peatlands are being ruthlessly cleared to cultivate oil palms and Nestle is using over 320,000 tons of palm every year sourced mainly from the controversial Sinar Mas group, Indonesia’s largest producer of palm oil, which burn and plunder the rainforests. Most of the popular products of Nestle including Nestlé Crunch, CoffeeMate, and PowerBar use palmoil and this incident has set off a debate over Nestle’s environmental credentials.
We’ll continue to put the video up on other websites until Nestlé removes all rainforest destroying palm oil from its supply chain.”" Greenpeace Head of Campaigns, Steve Campbell, said.
To reduce the pressure on the tropical forests, a group of stakeholders, including NGOs, producers and retailers, formed the Round table on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) way back in 2004, which promoted ways and means to make palm oil production less damaging to the environment. However, these drives were battered by a series of scandals, including the recent Nestle debacle. Though several major companies, including Unilever, the world’s largest buyer of palm oil and Kraft are promoting this sustainable cause , Nestle has always remained adamant .
This scandal has put a serious blotch on the reputation of Nestle, which is yet to come clear of the milk powder scandal in Africa. It seems that the powder milk scandal has not taught them anything!
We at reputation management for.com suggest what they should have done? To come out of this tight spot, Nestlé should develop a social networking crisis plan to track and respond to attacks against its brand. This doesn’t mean that Nestle will have to literally surrender to the cause but they can build a relationship and send out positive message about their social concern to the consumers and the proposed plan of action to clear the controversy, and to remain in the race!
Amitabh Bachchan aka controversy
Amitabh Bachchan, the legendry actor of Bollywood seems to be amidst a controversy for all the wrong reasons. This time it started with Amitabh Bachchan agreeing to be the brand ambassador for Gujarat (a state in India). This led to massive opposition by the ruling Congress party. Meanwhile Amitabh had claimed that, by accepting the brand ambassadorship for the state, he is not endorsing the Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi or his politics, but just the state’s tourism.
If we look at the large picture, we can find that, its not the first time Amitabh Bachchan has been dragged into such a controversy, the star does have a history of being part of many such controversies.
The political boxing involving Bachchan has raised a serious concern for his online reputation. Being a national icon and noted celebrity all over the world, Bachchan has to give a thought, on does he really needs to be watchfull when it comes to politics.
“You want to stop me from promoting tourism in a state because you have reason to believe that there are political connotations to the event. This is such rubbish! All I shall be doing will be working in a short film that shall highlight the various places of interest in the state, so that it encourages more tourists to visit the region,” he said. Bachchan said those who take umbrage at his association with Gujarat do not have the courage to stop “a Ratan Tata or an Ambani” from investing in the state and running successful ventures there.
Its not only Amitabh who is in soup, his son Abhishek Bachchan too has had to face the music when the posters featuring him were removed from the Earth Hour event held in Delhi.
We, at Reputation Management For.com feel that,
- Amithabh Bachchan meticulously needs to chalk out a well defined strategy for himself, clean of all controversies.
- We also found that he runs a blog where he express his views about all the controversies he faces, which is a good sign.
- The need of the hour is a strong PR and a perfect online reputation.
- Being a celebrity entails lots of responsibilities; you are there online and obviously people follow you.
- Imagine one bad comment can tarnish your online reputation beyond repair. And search engines have the habit to show those posts which gets maximum hits on top, needless to say people love reading all sorts of negative stories about their stars.
Online Celebrity Reputation Management is one tool which ensures that every negative comments is tracked and dealt sternly. Also we feel that Amitabh should clear his stance and make more positive vibes online before being considered a political football by his fans.
Google searches now show mixed results both negative as well funny ones for the star. This can be damaging for the iconic hero, and surely he will not want to take chances with his goodwill, which others are enjoying at his expense.